Display Mode:

    Main content

    Health Information

    Catheter Ablation for a Fast Heart Rate

    Catheter Ablation for a Fast Heart Rate

    Skip to the navigation

    Treatment Overview

    Catheter ablation is a procedure used to selectively destroy areas of the heart that are causing a heart rhythm problem.

    Thin, flexible wires called catheters are inserted into a vein, typically in the groin or neck. They are threaded up through the vein and into the heart. There is an electrode at the tip of each wire. The electrode sends out radio waves that create heat. This heat destroys the heart tissue that causes the fast heart rate. Another option is to use freezing cold to destroy the heart tissue.

    Catheter ablation is done in a hospital where the person can be carefully monitored. The procedure is done with an electrophysiology (EP) study, which can identify specific areas of heart tissue where the fast heart rate may start or where abnormal electrical pathways are located inside or outside the atrioventricular (AV) node . This allows doctors to pinpoint exactly what tiny area of heart muscle to destroy.

    A local anesthetic is used at the site where the catheter is inserted. The person usually stays awake during the procedure but may be sedated.

    What To Expect After Treatment

    Recovery from catheter ablation is usually quick. Some people may be hospitalized for 1 to 2 days after the procedure so doctors can monitor heart rate and rhythm. Many people go home the same day.

    Why It Is Done

    Catheter ablation is often used for people who have persistent or recurrent fast heart rates that do not respond to drug therapy. Or it is used for people who have certain types of fast heart rates and who do not want to take medicine. footnote 1, footnote 2

    Ablation might be done to treat:

    How Well It Works

    Catheter ablation can eliminate atrioventricular nodal reciprocating tachycardia (AVNRT), a type of supraventricular tachycardia, in almost all cases. footnote 2

    This procedure can successfully eliminate WPW most of the time. There is a small risk of the arrhythmia recurring even after successful ablation of WPW. But a second session of catheter ablation is usually successful. footnote 2

    For ventricular tachycardia, catheter ablation might make the arrhythmia happen less often or stop the arrhythmia from happening again. footnote 1

    Risks

    Catheter ablation is considered safe.

    But it has some risks. They include: footnote 3

    You will have to decide whether the possible benefits of ablation outweigh these risks. Your doctor can help you decide.

    If there is damage to the heart's electrical system during the procedure, you will need a pacemaker. This may happen in about 1 out of 100 people. footnote 3 This means that 99 out of 100 people may not need a pacemaker. With some types of SVT, where the abnormal cells are not close to the heart's electrical system, there is a lower risk of needing a pacemaker.

    What To Think About

    For help on the decision to have catheter ablation, see:

    Supraventricular Tachycardia: Should I Have Catheter Ablation?

    Complete the special treatment information form (PDF) (What is a PDF document?) to help you understand this treatment.

    References

    Citations

    1. Aliot EM, et al. (2009). EHRA/HRS expert consensus on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias. Heart Rhythm, 6(6): 886-933.
    2. Page RL, et al. (2015). 2015 ACC/AHA/HRS guideline for the management of adult patients with supraventricular tachycardia: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation. DOI: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000311. Accessed September 23, 2015.
    3. Calkins H, et al. (1999). Catheter ablation of accessory pathways, atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia, and the atrioventricular junction: final results of a prospective, multicenter clinical trial. The Atakr Multicenter Investigators Group. Circulation, 99(2): 262-270. DOI:10.1161/01.CIR.99.2.262. Accessed January 19, 2016.

    Credits

    ByHealthwise Staff
    Primary Medical Reviewer Rakesh K. Pai, MD, FACC - Cardiology, Electrophysiology
    Martin J. Gabica, MD - Family Medicine
    E. Gregory Thompson, MD - Internal Medicine
    Specialist Medical Reviewer John M. Miller, MD, FACC - Cardiology, Electrophysiology

    Current as ofJanuary 27, 2016

    This information does not replace the advice of a doctor. Healthwise, Incorporated, disclaims any warranty or liability for your use of this information. Your use of this information means that you agree to the Terms of Use. Learn how we develop our content.

    © 1995-2016 Healthwise, Incorporated. Healthwise, Healthwise for every health decision, and the Healthwise logo are trademarks of Healthwise, Incorporated.