How Physician Self-Perceptions Affect the Impact of Peer Comparison Feedback on Opioid Prescribing

, American Journal of Medical Quality, 2023 Apr 05

Investigators

Abstract

Peer comparison feedback is a promising strategy for reducing opioid prescribing and opioid-related harms. Such comparisons may be particularly impactful among underestimating clinicians who do not perceive themselves as high prescribers relative to their peers. But peer comparisons could also unintentionally increase prescribing among overestimating clinicians who do not perceive themselves as lower prescribers than peers. The objective of this study was to assess if the impact of peer comparisons varied by clinicians' preexisting opioid prescribing self-perceptions. Subgroup analysis of a randomized trial of peer comparison interventions among emergency department and urgent care clinicians was used. Generalized mixed-effects models were used to assess whether the impact of peer comparisons, alone or combined with individual feedback, varied by underestimating or overestimating prescriber status. Underestimating and overestimating prescribers were defined as those who self-reported relative prescribing amounts that were lower and higher, respectively, than actual relative baseline amounts. The primary outcome was pills per opioid prescription. Among 438 clinicians, 54% (n = 236) provided baseline prescribing self-perceptions and were included in this analysis. Overall, 17% (n = 40) were underestimating prescribers whereas 5% (n = 11) were overestimating prescribers. Underestimating prescribers exhibited a differentially greater decrease in pills per prescription compared to nonunderestimating clinicians when receiving peer comparison feedback (1.7 pills, 95% CI, -3.2 to -0.2 pills) or combined peer and individual feedback (2.8 pills, 95% CI, -4.8 to -0.8 pills). In contrast, there were no differential changes in pills per prescription for overestimating versus nonoverestimating prescribers after receiving peer comparison (1.5 pills, 95% CI, -0.9 to 3.9 pills) or combined peer and individual feedback (3.0 pills, 95% CI, -0.3 to 6.2 pills). Peer comparisons were more impactful among clinicians who underestimated their prescribing compared to peers. By correcting inaccurate self-perceptions, peer comparison feedback can be an effective strategy for influencing opioid prescribing.

Pubmed Abstract

Pubmed AbstractOpens New Window

Associated Topics

Related Publications

Statin dosing instructions, medication adherence, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol: a cohort study of incident statin users.

Marcum ZA, Huang HC, Romanelli RJ.
J Gen Intern Med. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05180-7. [Epub ahead of print]
2019 Jul 31

Synergistic drug combinations from electronic health records and gene expression.

Low YS, Daugherty AC, Schroeder EA, Chen W, Seto T, Weber S, Lim M, Hastie T, Mathur M, Desai M, Farrington C, Radin AA, Sirota M, Kenkare P, Thompson CA, Yu PP, Gomez SL, Sledge GW Jr, Kurian AW, Shah NH.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. pii: ocw161. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw161. [Epub ahead of print]
2016 Dec 09

Estimating generic drug use with electronic health records data from a health care delivery system: implications for quality improvement and research.

Nimbal V, Segal JB, Romanelli RJ.
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 22(10):1143-7. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2016.22.10.1143.
2016 Oct 01

Inability of primary care providers to predict medication fulfillment of new prescriptions.

Wright EA, VanLoan RP, Sundaresan AS, Jones JB, Xie J, Fischer MA.
J Patient Cent Res Rev. 2(2):129.
2015 Apr 30

Initiation of osteoporosis treatment after bone mineral density testing.

Pressman A, Forsyth B, Ettinger B, Tosteson AN.
Osteoporos Int. 12(5):337-42.
2001 May 01