Jump to content

  • Set Your Location
  • Sign in or Enroll
Set Your LocationKahi Mohala
  • Sign in or Enroll
    • Open I want to choose my medical group or hospital
    • Clear my location
Change Location
Sutter Health
  • Video Visits
  • Find Doctors
  • Find Locations
  • Treatments & Services
    • Video Visits
    • Find Doctors
    • Find Locations
    • Treatments & Services
    • COVID-19 Resources
    • Pay a Bill
    • Symptom Checker
    • Get Care Today
    • Health & Wellness
    • Classes & Events
    • Research & Clinical Trials
    • For Patients
    • About Sutter Health
    • Giving
    • Volunteering
    • Careers
    • News
    • For Medical Professionals
    • Other Business Services
Close Search
  • Home
  • Kāhi Mōhala
  • Research
  • Comparative Effectiveness
Content

Effectiveness of a group-based lifestyle change program versus usual care: an electronic health record, propensity score-matched cohort study

Description

Robert J. Romanelli , Hsiao-Ching Huang , Sylvia Sudat , Alice R. Pressman, Kristen M. J. Azar, Am J Prev Med. 2020 Dec;59(6):850-859. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.07.002. Epub, 2020 Nov 18

Investigators

Kristen Azar, R.N., BSN, MSN/MPH, Investigator, Sylvia Sudat, PhD

Abstract

Introduction: Translational lifestyle change programs for community and clinical settings have been available for a decade, yet there are limited data on their comparative effectiveness. This study examines the effectiveness of a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-aligned lifestyle change program relative to usual care in clinical practice.

Methods: This was an electronic health record-based retrospective cohort study conducted in a community-based healthcare system. Investigators identified adult program participants and usual-care patients in the electronic health record between 2010 and 2018 and defined their index date (baseline) as the first lifestyle change program encounter or a random encounter date, respectively. Participants were matched 1:2 to usual-care patients on baseline demographics and clinical characteristics using propensity-score methods. Changes in body weight and blood pressure were examined from baseline through 24 months.

Results: The authors identified 2,833 program participants and 438,432 usual-care patients meeting study eligibility criteria. A total of 2,833 program participants were matched to 4,776 usual-care patients; the average age was 54 years, and 80% of the participants were female. Program participation was associated with a 1.9- and 1.6-fold higher prevalence of clinically meaningful (≥5%) weight loss at 12- and 24-month follow-up than usual care and a higher prevalence of blood pressure control at 12 months but not at 24 months. Patients without type 2 diabetes at baseline had more pronounced outcomes than those with type 2 diabetes.

Conclusions: This study demonstrates the effectiveness of an evidence-based, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-aligned lifestyle change program in reducing cardiometabolic risk factors compared with usual care in clinical practice, with long-term reductions in weight and transient reductions in blood pressure.

Pubmed Abstract

Pubmed AbstractOpens New Window

Associated Topics

  • Comparative Effectiveness

Related Publications

Minimran: a robust online system to implement minimization in randomized clinical trials.

Xiao L, Ma J.
JSM Proc, Biopharm Section. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association 2014; 1094-1100.
2014 Aug 06

Meta-analysis 101: what you want to know in the era of comparative effectiveness.

Jones JB, Blecker S, Shah NR.
Am Health Drug Benefits. 1(3):38-43.
2008 Apr 01

Should we reconsider the routine use of placebo controls in clinical research?

Avins AL, Cherkin DC, Sherman KJ, Goldberg H, Pressman A.
Trials. 13:44. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-44.
2012 Apr 27

A framework for examining the function of digital health technologies for weight management.

Azar KMJ, Bennett GG, Nolting LA, Rosas LG, Burke LE, Ma J.
Transl Behav Med. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibx050. [Epub ahead of print]
2018 Jan 27

Tramadol/acetaminophen combination tablets and codeine/acetaminophen combination capsules for the management of chronic pain: a comparative trial.

Mullican WS, Lacy JR; TRAMAP-ANAG-006 Study Group.
Clin Ther. 23(9):1429-45.
2001 Sep 01
The Sutter Health Network of Care
Expertise to fit your needs
Primary Care

Check-ups, screenings and sick visits for adults and children.

Specialty Care

Expertise and advanced technologies in all areas of medicine.

Emergency Care

For serious accidents, injuries and conditions that require immediate medical care.

Urgent Care

After-hours, weekend and holiday services.

Walk-In Care

Convenient walk-in care clinics for your non-urgent health needs.

  • Contact Us
  • Find Doctors
  • Find Locations
  • Request Medical Records
  • Make a Gift
Sign in to My Health Online

Billing and Insurance

  • Pay a Bill
  • Accepted Health Plans
  • Estimate Costs
  • Medicare Advantage

About Sutter

  • About Our Network
  • Community Benefit
  • Annual Report
  • News

Our Team

  • For Employees
  • For Medical Professionals
  • For Vendors
  • For Volunteers

Careers

  • Jobs at Sutter
  • Physician Jobs
  • Graduate Medical Education

Copyright © 2023 Sutter Health. All rights reserved. Sutter Health is a registered trademark of Sutter Health ®, Reg. U.S. Patent & Trademark office.

  • ADA Accessibility
  • Privacy
  • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
  • LinkedIn Opens new window
  • YouTube Opens new window
  • Facebook Opens new window
  • Twitter Opens new window
  • Instagram Opens new window
  • Glassdoor Opens new window

Cookie Policy

We use cookies to give you the best possible user experience. By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. Privacy Policy Cookie Preferences

Privacy Policy Cookie Preferences