Effectiveness of a group-based lifestyle change program versus usual care: an electronic health record, propensity score-matched cohort study
Abstract
Introduction: Translational lifestyle change programs for community and clinical settings have been available for a decade, yet there are limited data on their comparative effectiveness. This study examines the effectiveness of a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-aligned lifestyle change program relative to usual care in clinical practice.
Methods: This was an electronic health record-based retrospective cohort study conducted in a community-based healthcare system. Investigators identified adult program participants and usual-care patients in the electronic health record between 2010 and 2018 and defined their index date (baseline) as the first lifestyle change program encounter or a random encounter date, respectively. Participants were matched 1:2 to usual-care patients on baseline demographics and clinical characteristics using propensity-score methods. Changes in body weight and blood pressure were examined from baseline through 24 months.
Results: The authors identified 2,833 program participants and 438,432 usual-care patients meeting study eligibility criteria. A total of 2,833 program participants were matched to 4,776 usual-care patients; the average age was 54 years, and 80% of the participants were female. Program participation was associated with a 1.9- and 1.6-fold higher prevalence of clinically meaningful (≥5%) weight loss at 12- and 24-month follow-up than usual care and a higher prevalence of blood pressure control at 12 months but not at 24 months. Patients without type 2 diabetes at baseline had more pronounced outcomes than those with type 2 diabetes.
Conclusions: This study demonstrates the effectiveness of an evidence-based, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-aligned lifestyle change program in reducing cardiometabolic risk factors compared with usual care in clinical practice, with long-term reductions in weight and transient reductions in blood pressure.
Research topics
Related publications
View all publications- Avins AL, Cherkin DC, Sherman KJ, Goldberg H, Pressman A.Trials. 13:44. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-44.2012 Apr 27
- Romanelli RJ, Wu FM, Gamba R, Mojtabai R, Segal JB.Depress Anxiety. 31(8):641-52. doi: 10.1002/da.22232. Epub 2014 Jan 3.2014 Aug 01
- Publication
Minimran: a robust online system to implement minimization in randomized clinical trials.
Xiao L, Ma J.JSM ProcBiopharm Section. AlexandriaVA: American Statistical Association 2014; 1094-1100.2014 Aug 06 - Publication
Selection bias modeling using observed data augmented with imputed record-level probabilities.
Thompson CA, Arah OA.Ann Epidemiol. pii: S1047-2797(14)00364-0. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2014.07.014. [Epub ahead of print]2014 Aug 12 - Jones JB, Blecker S, Shah NR.Am Health Drug Benefits. 1(3):38-43.2008 Apr 01




