Does the frequency of pay-for-performance payment matter? Experience from a randomized trial.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of incentive payment frequency on quality measures in a physician-specific pay-for-performance (P4P) experiment.
STUDY SETTING: A multispecialty physician group practice.
STUDY DESIGN: In 2007, all primary care physicians (n=179) were randomized into two study arms differing by the frequency of incentive payment, either four quarterly bonus checks or a single year-end bonus (maximum of U.S.$5,000/year for both arms).
DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: Data were extracted from electronic health records. Quality measure scores between the two arms over four quarters were compared.
PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: There was no difference between the two arms in average quality measure score or in total bonus amount earned.
CONCLUSIONS: Physicians' responses to a P4P program with a small maximum bonus do not differ by frequency of bonus payment.
Research topics
Related publications
View all publications- Hussey PS, Luft HS, McNamara P.Med Care Res Rev. 71(5 Suppl):5S-16S. doi: 10.1177/1077558714535980. Epub 2014 May 27.2014 Oct 01
- Panattoni L, Stone A, Chung S, Tai-Seale M.J Gen Intern Med. [Epub ahead of print]2014 Nov 22
- Stults CD, Li J, Frosch DL, Krishnan H, Smith-McCurdy G, Jones VG, Chan AS.JAMA Netw Open. 2(12):e1917445. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.17445.2019 Dec 02
- Publication
Shared decision making as part of value based care: new U.S. policies challenge our readiness.
Spatz ES, Elwyn G, Moulton BW, Volk RJ, Frosch DL.Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. pii: S1865-9217(17)30087-9. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2017.05.012. [Epub ahead of print]2017 May 20 - Publication
Does consumer satisfaction information matter? Evidence on member retention in FEHBP plans.
Tai-Seale M.Med Care Res Rev. 61(2):171-86.2004 Jun 01