Use of gene expression profiling and chemotherapy in early-stage breast cancer: a study of linked electronic medical records, cancer registry data, and genomic data across two health care systems.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The 21-gene recurrence score (RS) identifies patients with breast cancer who derive little benefit from chemotherapy; it may reduce unwarranted variability in the use of chemotherapy. We tested whether the use of RS seems to guide chemotherapy receipt across different cancer care settings.
METHODS: We developed a retrospective cohort of patients with breast cancer by using electronic medical record data from Stanford University (hereafter University) and Palo Alto Medical Foundation (hereafter Community) linked with demographic and staging data from the California Cancer Registry and RS results from the testing laboratory (Genomic Health Inc., Redwood City, CA). Multivariable analysis was performed to identify predictors of RS and chemotherapy use.
RESULTS: In all, 10,125 patients with breast cancer were diagnosed in the University or Community systems from 2005 to 2011; 2,418 (23.9%) met RS guidelines criteria, of whom 15.6% received RS. RS was less often used for patients with involved lymph nodes, higher tumor grade, and age < 40 or ≥ 65 years. Among RS recipients, chemotherapy receipt was associated with a higher score (intermediate v low: odds ratio, 3.66; 95% CI, 1.94 to 6.91). A total of 293 patients (10.6%) received care in both health care systems (hereafter dual use); although receipt of RS was associated with dual use (v University: odds ratio, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.18 to 2.55), there was no difference in use of chemotherapy after RS by health care setting.
CONCLUSION: Although there was greater use of RS for patients who sought care in more than one health care setting, use of chemotherapy followed RS guidance in University and Community health care systems. These results suggest that precision medicine may help optimize cancer treatment across health care settings.
Related publications
View all publications- Chan JK, Liang SY, Kapp DS, Chan JE, Herzog TJ, Coleman RL, Monk BJ, Richardson MT.Gynecol Oncol. S0090-8258(20)33910-X. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.09.017. Online ahead of print.2020 Sep 26
- Afghahi A, Purington N, Han SS, Desai M, Pierson E, Mathur MB, Seto T, Thompson CA, Rigdon J, Telli ML, Badve SS, Curtis C, West RB, Horst K, Gomez SL, Ford JM, Sledge GW, Kurian AW.Clin Cancer Res. pii: clincanres.1323.2017. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-1323. [Epub ahead of print]2018 Mar 26
- Rendle KA, Halley MC, May SG, Frosch DL.Qual Health Res. 25(9):1251-9. doi: 10.1177/1049732314557085. Epub 2014 Nov 4.2015 Sep 01
- Halley MC, May SG, Rendle KA, Frosch DL, Kurian AW.Cult Health Sex. 1-12. [Epub ahead of print]2014 Aug 20
- Low YS, Daugherty AC, Schroeder EA, Chen W, Seto T, Weber S, Lim M, Hastie T, Mathur M, Desai M, Farrington C, Radin AA, Sirota M, Kenkare P, Thompson CA, Yu PP, Gomez SL, Sledge GW Jr, Kurian AW, Shah NH.J Am Med Inform Assoc. pii: ocw161. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw161. [Epub ahead of print]2016 Dec 09




