Practice-level approaches for behavioral counseling and patient health behaviors.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is little empirical evidence to show that a practice-level approach that includes identifying patients in need of health behavior advice and linking them to counseling resources either in the practice or in the community results in improvements in patients' behaviors. This study examined whether patients in primary care practices that had practice-level approaches for physical activity and healthy-diet counseling were more likely to have healthier behaviors than patients in practices without practice-level approaches.
METHODS: A cross-sectional study of 54 primary care practices was conducted from July 2005 to January 2007. Practices were categorized into four groups depending on whether they had both identification tools (health risk assessment, registry) and linking strategies (within practice or to community resources); identification tools but no linking strategies; linking strategies but no identification tools; or neither identification tools nor linking strategies.
RESULTS: Controlling for patient and practice characteristics, practices that had both identification tools and linking strategies for physical activity counseling were 80% more likely (95% CI=1.25, 2.59) to have patients who reported exercising regularly compared to practices that lacked both. Also, practices that had either identification tools or linking strategies but not both were approximately 50% more likely to have patients who reported exercising regularly. The use of a greater number of practice-level approaches for physical activity counseling was associated with higher odds of patients' reporting exercising regularly (p for trend=0.0002). Use of identification tools and linking strategies for healthy-eating counseling was not associated with patients' reports of healthy diets.
CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that practice-level approaches may enable primary care practices to help patients improve physical activity. However, these approaches may have different effects on different behaviors, and merit further research to determine if causal pathways exist and, if so, how they should be applied.
Related publications
View all publications- Ory MG, Yuma PJ, Hurwicz ML, Jarvis C, Barron KL, Tai-Seale T, Tai-Seale M, Patel D, Hackethorn D, Bramson R, Street R, Cook MA.Prev Med. 43(6):494-7. Epub 2006 Aug 9.2006 Dec 06
- Block G, Azar KM, Romanelli RJ, Block TJ, Hopkins D, Carpenter HA, Dolginsky MS, Hudes ML, Palaniappan LP, Block CH.J Med Internet Res. 17(10):e240. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4897.2015 Oct 23
- Fernald DH, Froshaug DB, Dickinson LM, Balasubramanian BA, Dodoo MS, Holtrop JS, Hung DY, Glasgow RE, Niebauer LJ, Green LA.Am J Prev Med. 35(5 Suppl):S414-22. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.08.006.2008 Nov 01
- Rosas LG, Lv N, Lewis MA, Venditti EM, Zavella P, Luna V, Ma J.J Am Board Fam Med. 31(3):364-374. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2018.03.170280.2018 May 01
- Azar KM, Aurora M, Wang EJ, Muzaffar A, Pressman A, Palaniappan LP.Transl Behav Med. 5(1):37-44. doi: 10.1007/s13142-014-0296-6.2015 Mar 01




