Actions and processes that patients, family members, and physicians associate with patient- and family-centered care.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patient- and family-centered care (PFCC) is increasingly linked to improved communication, care quality, and patient decision making. However, in order to consistently implement and study PFCC, health care systems and researchers need a solid evidentiary base. Most current definitions and models of PFCC are broad and conceptual, and difficult to translate into measurable behaviors and actions. This paper provides a brief overview of all actions that focus group respondents associated with PFCC in ambulatory (outpatient) care settings and then explores actions associated with the concept of "dignity and respect" in greater detail.
METHODS: We conducted nine focus groups with patients, family members, and physicians in three metropolitan regions across the United States. Group discussions were transcribed and analyzed using a thematic analysis approach.
RESULTS: We identified 14 domains and 47 specific actions that patients, family members, and physicians associate with PFCC. In addition to providing a detailed matrix of these domains and actions, this paper details the actions associated with the "dignity and respect" concept. Key domains identified under "dignity and respect" include: 1) building relationships, 2) providing individualized care, and 3) respecting patients' time. Within these domains we identified specific actions that break down these abstract ideas into explicit and measurable units such as taking time, listening, including family, and minimizing wait times. We identified 9, 6, and 3 specific actions associated, respectively, with building relationships, providing individualized care, and respecting patients' time.
CONCLUSIONS: Our work fills a critical gap in our ability to understand and measure PFCC in ambulatory care settings by breaking down abstract concepts about PFCC into specific measurable actions. Our findings can be used to support research on how PFCC affects clinical outcomes and develop innovative tools and policies to support PFCC.
Research topics
Related publications
View all publications- Frosch DL.J Gen Intern Med. 30(10):1383-4. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3476-2.2015 Oct 01
- Elwyn G, Durand MA, Song J, Aarts J, Barr PJ, Berger Z, Cochran N, Frosch D, Galasinski D, Gulbrandsen P, Han PKJ, Härter M, Kinnersley P, Lloyd A, Mishra M, Perestelo-Perez L, Scholl I, Tomori K, Trevena L, Witteman HO, Van der Weijden T.BMJ. 2017 Nov 6;359:j4891. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j4891.2017 Nov 06
- Shih Y, Tai-Seale M.Health Econ. 21(3):252-69. doi: 10.1002/hec.1710. Epub 2011 Jan 31.2012 Mar 01
- Dohan D, McCuistion MH, Frosch DL, Hung DY, Tai-Seale M.Ann Fam Med. 11 Suppl 1:S14-8. doi: 10.1370/afm.14882013 May 01
- Bayne AI, Dullabh P, Skillman M, Ubri P, Rotondo C, Zainulbhai S, Frosch DL, Devers KJ.J Comp Eff Res. doi: 10.2217/cer-2019-0203. [Epub ahead of print]2020 Jul 16




