Patient experiences in selecting a Medicare Part D prescription drug plan.
Abstract
Introduction: Medicare beneficiaries often report that the process of choosing a prescription drug plan is frustrating and confusing and many do not enroll in the plan that covers their drugs at the lowest cost.
Methods: We conducted 4 focus groups to understand beneficiaries’ experiences in selecting a drug plan to identify what resources and factors were most important to them. Participants were patients served by a multispecialty delivery system and were primarily affluent and Caucasian.
Results: While low cost was essential to many, other characteristics like having the same plan as a partner, company reputation, convenience, and anticipation of possible future health problems were sometimes more important. Although some used resources including insurance brokers, counselors, and websites beyond Medicare.gov, many expressed a desire for greater assistance with and greater simplicity in the choice process.
Conclusion: Although older adults would likely benefit from greater assistance in choosing Medicare Part D prescription drug plans, more research is necessary to understand how to help with decision-making in this context.
Related publications
View all publications- Chung S, Lesser LI, Lauderdale DS, Johns NE, Palaniappan LP, Luft HS.Health Aff (Millwood). 34(1):11-20. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0483.2015 Jan 01
- Sudat SEK, Franco A, Pressman AR, Rosenfeld K, Gornet E, Stewart W.Palliat Med. 2018 Feb;32(2):485-492. doi: 10.1177/0269216317711824. Epub 2017 Jun 7.2018 Feb 01
- McClellan SR, Casalino LP, Shortell SM, Rittenhouse DR.J Am Med Inform Assoc. 20(e1):e26-32. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001271. Epub 2013 Feb 8.2013 Jun 01
- Publication
Advance care planning in older adults with multiple chronic conditions undergoing high-risk surgery.
Tang VL, Dillon EC, Yang Y, Tai-Seale M, Boscardin J, Kata A, Sudore RL.JAMA Surg. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.4647. [Epub ahead of print]2018 Dec 05 - Tai-Seale M, McGuire TG, Zhang W.Health Serv Res. 42(5):1871-94.2007 Oct 01




