Smoking-cessation interventions after lung cancer screening guideline change.
Abstract
Introduction: Recent guideline changes for lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography recommend smoking-cessation interventions be done in parallel with screening. The purpose of this study is to determine the post-guideline rates of smoking-cessation interventions among patients eligible and ineligible for lung cancer screening.
Methods: Using electronic health records collected from a large ambulatory care system in northern California between 2010 and 2017, authors identified new patients who were current smokers aged 55-80 years visiting a primary care provider, and grouped patients into lung cancer screening-eligible heavy smokers, screening-ineligible moderate smokers, and screening-ineligible light smokers. Screening-eligible smokers versus screening-ineligible smokers were compared in receipt of smoking-cessation interventions before (2010-2013) and after (2014-2017) the guideline change, overall and by intervention type (formal counseling, informal counseling, pharmacotherapy) using hierarchical generalized linear models. Analyses were conducted in 2018-2019.
Results: After the guideline change, the likelihood of receiving any smoking-cessation intervention (OR=1.44, 95% CI=1.28, 1.61, p<0.05), informal counseling (OR=1.29, 95% CI=1.15, 1.46, p<0.05), and pharmacotherapy (OR=1.24, 95% CI=1.02, 1.50, p<0.05) during a new patient visit significantly increased, with the increase not varying by level of smoking. For formal counseling, the post-guideline increase was greater for screening-eligible heavy smokers (OR=3.15, 95% CI=1.18, 8.36, p<0.05) and moderate smokers (OR=3.58, 95% CI=1.29, 9.95, p<0.05) relative to light smokers.
Conclusions: Smoking-cessation interventions increased after new lung cancer screening guidelines. Given the sizable adverse impacts of smoking on morbidity and mortality, small increases in the implementation of smoking-cessation interventions could have substantial public health benefits.
Research topics
Related publications
View all publications- Li J, Chung S, Wei EK, Luft HS.BMC Health Serv Res. 18(1):525. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3338-9.2018 Jul 05
- Jones JB, Shah NR, Bruce CA, Stewart WF.Am J Prev Med. 40(5 Suppl 2):S179-86. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.01.017.2011 May 01
- Lv N, Xiao L, Simmons ML, Rosas LG, Chan A, Entwistle M.J Med Internet Res. 19(9):e311. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7831.2017 Sep 19
- Publication
Using the PARAFAC2 tensor factorization on EHR audit data to understand PCP desktop work.
Perros I, Yan X, Jones JB, Sun J, Stewart WF.J Biomed Inform. 101:103312. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103312. Epub 2019 Oct 15.2020 Jan 01 - Ward A, Sarraju A, Chung S, Li J, Harrington R, Heidenreich P, Palaniappan L, Scheinker D, Rodriguez F.NPJ Digit Med. 3:125. doi: 10.1038/s41746-020-00331-1. eCollection 2020.2020 Sep 23




