Under diagnosis of hypertension using electronic health records.
Abstract
Background: Hypertension is highly prevalent and contributes to cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Appropriate identification of hypertension is fundamental for its management. The rates of appropriate hypertension diagnosis in outpatient settings using an electronic health record (EHR) have not been well studied. We sought to identify prevalent and incident hypertension cases in a large outpatient healthcare system, examine the diagnosis rates of prevalent and incident hypertension, and identify clinical and demographic factors associated with appropriate hypertension diagnosis.
Methods: We analyzed a 3-year, cross-sectional sample of 251,590 patients aged ≥18 years using patient EHRs. Underlying hypertension was defined as two or more abnormal blood pressure (ABP) readings ≥140/90 mm Hg and/or pharmaceutical treatment. Appropriate hypertension diagnosis was defined by the reporting of ICD-9 codes (401.0–401.9). Factors associated with hypertension diagnosis were assessed through multivariate analyses of patient clinical and demographic characteristics.
Results: The prevalence of hypertension was 28.7%, and the diagnosis rate was 62.9%. The incidence of hypertension was 13.3%, with a diagnosis rate of 19.9%. Predictors of diagnosis for prevalent hypertension included older age, Asian, African American, higher body mass index (BMI), and increased number of ABP readings. Predictors for incident hypertension diagnosis were similar. In patients with two or more ABP readings, hypertension diagnosis was associated with significantly higher medication treatment rates (92.6% vs. 15.8%, P < 0.0001).
Conclusions: Outpatient EHR diagnosis rates are suboptimal, yet EHR diagnosis of hypertension is strongly associated with treatment. Targeted efforts to improve diagnosis should be a priority.
Research topics
Related publications
View all publications- Ward A, Sarraju A, Chung S, Li J, Harrington R, Heidenreich P, Palaniappan L, Scheinker D, Rodriguez F.NPJ Digit Med. 3:125. doi: 10.1038/s41746-020-00331-1. eCollection 2020.2020 Sep 23
- Kosiborod M, Inzucchi SE, Goyal A, Krumholz HM, Masoudi FA, Xiao L, Spertus JA.JAMA. 301(15):1556-64. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.496.2009 Apr 15
- Wright EA, Steinhubl SR, Jones JB, Barua P, Yan X, Van Loan R, Frederick G, Bhandary D, Cobden D.Am J Manag Care. 2017 Apr 1;23(4):e106-e112.2017 Apr 01
- Manjunath L, Chung S, Li J, Shah H, Palaniappan L, Yong CM.J Am Heart Assoc. e014362. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.014362. [Epub ahead of print]2020 May 11
- Jones JB, Bruce CA, Shah NR, Taylor WF, Stewart WF.Transl Behav Med. 1(1):123-33. doi: 10.1007/s13142-011-0023-5.2011 Mar 01




