Jump to content

  • Set Your Location
  • Sign in or Enroll
Set Your LocationSet Your Location
  • Sign in or Enroll
    • Open I want to choose my medical group or hospital
    • Clear my location
Change Location
Sutter Health
  • Video Visits
  • Find Doctors
  • Find Locations
  • Treatments & Services
    • Video Visits
    • Find Doctors
    • Find Locations
    • Treatments & Services
    • COVID-19 Resources
    • Pay a Bill
    • Symptom Checker
    • Get Care Today
    • Health & Wellness
    • Classes & Events
    • Research & Clinical Trials
    • For Patients
    • About Sutter Health
    • Giving
    • Volunteering
    • Careers
    • News
    • For Medical Professionals
    • Other Business Services
Close Search
  • Home
  • Research
  • Musculoskeletal Disorders
Content

Exploring provider reactions to decision aid distribution and shared decision making: lessons from two specialties.

Description

Hsu C, Liss DT, Frosch DL, Westbrook EO, Arterburn D., Med Decis Making. 37(1):113-126. Epub 2016 Oct 6., 2017 Jan 01

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A critical component of shared decision making (SDM) is the role played by health care providers in distributing decision aids (DAs) and initiating SDM conversations. Existing literature indicates that decisions about designing and implementing DAs must take provider perspectives into account. However, little is known about how differences in provider attitudes across specialties may impact DA implementation and how provider attitudes may shift after DA implementation. Group Health's Decision Aid Implementation project was carried out in six specialties using 12 video-based DAs for preference-sensitive conditions; this study focused on two of the six specialties.

DESIGN: In-depth, qualitative interviews with specialty care providers in two specialties-orthopedics and cardiology-at two time points during DA implementation. Data were analyzed using a thematic analysis approach.

RESULTS: We interviewed 19 care providers in orthopedics and cardiology. All respondents believed that providing patients with accurate information on their health conditions and treatment options was important and that most patients wanted an active role in decision making. However, respondents diverged in decision-making styles and views on the practicality and appropriateness of using the DAs and SDM. For example, cardiology specialists were ambivalent about DAs for coronary artery disease because many viewed DAs and SDM as unnecessary or inappropriate for this clinical condition. Provider attitudes towards DAs and SDM were generally stable over two years.

LIMITATIONS: Limitations include a lack of patient perspectives, social desirability bias, and possible selection bias.

CONCLUSIONS: Successfully implementing DAs in clinical practice to promote SDM requires addressing individual provider attitudes, beliefs, and knowledge of SDM by specialty. During DA development and implementation, providers should be asked for input about the specific conditions and care processes that are most appropriate for SDM.

Pubmed Abstract

Pubmed AbstractOpens New Window

Associated Topics

  • Cardiovascular Diseases
  • Disease Management
  • Health Services
  • Musculoskeletal Disorders

Related Publications

Touchscreen questionnaire patient data collection in rheumatology practice: development of a highly successful system using process redesign.

Newman ED, Lerch V, Jones JB, Stewart W.
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 64(4):589-96. doi: 10.1002/acr.21560.
2012 Apr 01

Estimation of bone mineral density in children from diagnostic CT images: a comparison of methods with and without an internal calibration standard.

Habashy AH, Yan X, Brown JK, Xiong X, Kaste SC.
Bone. 48(5):1087-94. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2010.12.012. Epub 2010 Dec 23.
2011 May 01

Use of electronic health records for early detection of high-cost, low back pain patients.

Maeng DD, Stewart WF, Yan X, Boscarino JA, Mardekian J, Harnett J, Von Korff MR.
Pain Res Manag. 20(5):234-40. Epub 2015 Aug 20.
2015 Sep 01

Patterns of health care utilization for low back pain.

Stewart WF, Yan X, Boscarino JA, Maeng DD, Mardekian J, Sanchez RJ, Von Korff MR.
J Pain Res. 8:523-35. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S83599. eCollection 2015.
2015 Aug 12

Fracture risk tool validation in an integrated healthcare delivery system.

Lo JC, Pressman AR, Chandra M, Ettinger B.
Am J Manag Care. 17(3):188-94.
2011 Mar 01
The Sutter Health Network of Care
Expertise to fit your needs
Primary Care

Check-ups, screenings and sick visits for adults and children.

Specialty Care

Expertise and advanced technologies in all areas of medicine.

Emergency Care

For serious accidents, injuries and conditions that require immediate medical care.

Urgent Care

After-hours, weekend and holiday services.

Walk-In Care

Convenient walk-in care clinics for your non-urgent health needs.

  • Contact Us
  • Find Doctors
  • Find Locations
  • Request Medical Records
  • Make a Gift
Sign in to My Health Online

Billing and Insurance

  • Pay a Bill
  • Accepted Health Plans
  • Estimate Costs
  • Medicare Advantage

About Sutter

  • About Our Network
  • Community Benefit
  • Annual Report
  • News

Our Team

  • For Employees
  • For Medical Professionals
  • For Vendors
  • For Volunteers

Careers

  • Jobs at Sutter
  • Physician Jobs
  • Graduate Medical Education

Copyright © 2023 Sutter Health. All rights reserved. Sutter Health is a registered trademark of Sutter Health ®, Reg. U.S. Patent & Trademark office.

  • ADA Accessibility
  • Privacy
  • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
  • LinkedIn Opens new window
  • YouTube Opens new window
  • Facebook Opens new window
  • Twitter Opens new window
  • Instagram Opens new window
  • Glassdoor Opens new window

Cookie Policy

We use cookies to give you the best possible user experience. By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. Privacy Policy Cookie Preferences

Privacy Policy Cookie Preferences