Jump to content

  • Set Your Location
  • Sign in or Enroll
Set Your LocationSet Your Location
  • Sign in or Enroll
    • Open I want to choose my medical group or hospital
    • Clear my location
Change Location
Sutter Health
  • Video Visits
  • Find Doctors
  • Find Locations
  • Treatments & Services
    • Video Visits
    • Find Doctors
    • Find Locations
    • Treatments & Services
    • COVID-19 Resources
    • Pay a Bill
    • Symptom Checker
    • Get Care Today
    • Health & Wellness
    • Classes & Events
    • Research & Clinical Trials
    • For Patients
    • About Sutter Health
    • Giving
    • Volunteering
    • Careers
    • News
    • For Medical Professionals
    • Other Business Services
Close Search
  • Home
  • Research
  • Biostatistics
Content

Population-based registry linkages to improve validity of electronic health record-based cancer research.

Description

Thompson C, Jin A, Luft HS, Lichtensztajn DY, Allen L, Liang SY, Schumacher BT, Gomez SL., Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. pii: cebp.0882.2019. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-19-0882. [Epub ahead of print], 2020 Feb 17

Investigators

Su-Ying Liang, Ph.D., Research Economist / Faculty

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is tremendous potential to leverage the value gained from integrating electronic health records (EHRs) and population-based cancer registry data for research. Registries provide detailed diagnosis tumor characteristics, and treatment summaries, while EHRs contain rich clinical detail. A carefully conducted cancer registry linkage may also be used to improve the internal and external validity of inferences made from EHR-based studies.

METHODS: We linked the EHRs of a large, multispecialty, mixed-payer healthcare system with the statewide cancer registry and assessed the validity of our linked population. For internal validity, we identify patients that might be "missed" in a linkage, threatening the internal validity of an EHR study population. For generalizability, we compared linked cases with all other cancer patients in the 22-county EHR catchment region.

RESULTS: From an EHR population of 4.5M, we identified 306,554 cancer patients, 26% of the catchment regions cancer patients. 22.7% of linked patients were diagnosed with cancer after they migrated away from our healthcare system highlighting an advantage of system-wide linkage. We observed demographic differences between EHR patients and non-EHR patients in the surrounding region and demonstrated use of selection probabilities with model-based standardization to improve generalizability.

CONCLUSIONS: Our experiences set the foundation to encourage and inform researchers interested in working with EHRs for cancer research as well as provide context for leveraging linkages to assess and improve validity and generalizability.

IMPACT: Researchers conducting linkages may benefit from considering one or more of these approaches to establish and evaluate the validity of their EHR-based populations.

Pubmed Abstract

Pubmed AbstractOpens New Window

Associated Topics

  • Biostatistics
  • Cancer
  • Medical Informatics

Related Publications

Using variable importance measures from causal inference to rank risk factors of schistosomiasis infection in a rural setting in China.

Sudat SE, Carlton EJ, Seto EY, Spear RC, Hubbard AE.
Epidemiol Perspect Innov. 7:3. doi: 10.1186/1742-5573-7-3.
2010 Jul 14

Predicting all-cause risk of 30-day hospital readmission using artificial neural networks.

Jamei M, Nisnevich A, Wetchler E, Sudat S, Liu E.
PLoS One. 12(7):e0181173. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181173. eCollection 2017.
2017 Jul 14

Predicting need for advanced illness or palliative care in a primary care population using electronic health record data.

Jung K, Sudat SEK, Kwon N, Stewart WF, Shan NH.
J Biomed Inform. 92:103115.
2019 Apr 01

Causal inference and prediction in health studies: environmental exposures and schistosomiasis, HIV-1 genotypic susceptibility scores and virologic suppression, and risk of hospital readmission for heart failure patients.

Sudat, S.
UC Berkeley. ProQuest ID: Sudat_berkeley_0028E_12729. Merritt ID: ark:/13030/m5xw4pw5. Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9z03362s
2012 Jun 01

A comparison of two worlds: How does Bayes hold up to the status quo for the analysis of clinical trials?

Pressman AR, Avins AL, Hubbard A, Satariano WA.
Contemp Clin Trials. 32(4):561-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2011.03.010. Epub 2011 Mar 29.
2011 Jul 01
The Sutter Health Network of Care
Expertise to fit your needs
Primary Care

Check-ups, screenings and sick visits for adults and children.

Specialty Care

Expertise and advanced technologies in all areas of medicine.

Emergency Care

For serious accidents, injuries and conditions that require immediate medical care.

Urgent Care

After-hours, weekend and holiday services.

Walk-In Care

Convenient walk-in care clinics for your non-urgent health needs.

  • Contact Us
  • Find Doctors
  • Find Locations
  • Request Medical Records
  • Make a Gift
Sign in to My Health Online

Billing and Insurance

  • Pay a Bill
  • Accepted Health Plans
  • Estimate Costs
  • Medicare Advantage

About Sutter

  • About Our Network
  • Community Benefit
  • Annual Report
  • News

Our Team

  • For Employees
  • For Medical Professionals
  • For Vendors
  • For Volunteers

Careers

  • Jobs at Sutter
  • Physician Jobs
  • Graduate Medical Education

Copyright © 2023 Sutter Health. All rights reserved. Sutter Health is a registered trademark of Sutter Health ®, Reg. U.S. Patent & Trademark office.

  • ADA Accessibility
  • Privacy
  • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
  • LinkedIn Opens new window
  • YouTube Opens new window
  • Facebook Opens new window
  • Twitter Opens new window
  • Instagram Opens new window
  • Glassdoor Opens new window

Cookie Policy

We use cookies to give you the best possible user experience. By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. Privacy Policy Cookie Preferences

Privacy Policy Cookie Preferences